and Asia, has become a magnet for fintech startups, logistics corridors, and cross‑border e‑commerce. Because almost every serious growth initiative in the country now involves a mobile touchpoint—whether that is an SMS‑based payment confirmation, a one‑time password for a banking app, or a WhatsApp broadcast for wine‑tour promotions—accurate, well‑maintained Georgian phone‑number data has turned into a critical resource. The country’s population sits just under four million, yet its mobile‑penetration rate hovers at 135 percent: more SIM cards than people. Three mobile network operators—MagtiCom, Silknet (under the Beeline brand), and Cellfie Mobile—compete fiercely on both price and data allowances, which in turn pushes Georgians to maintain multiple lines. This churn, combined with the fact that mobile‑fixed portability has been allowed since 2011, means any marketing, authentication, or research project must begin with rigorous cleansing and validation of the raw numbers.
Georgia follows the ITU‑T E.164 numbering plan with the country finland phone number data code +995. In national format, mobile numbers are nine digits and typically start with 5 or 7; legacy landlines, still common in Tbilisi business districts, begin with 3 (for fixed Tbilisi) or 4 (for regions). Because the leading 0 is dropped in international format, a Georgian mobile that appears locally as 599 123 456 converts to +995 599 123 456 when dialed from abroad. A subtle but costly error for foreign data buyers is confusing 32, Tbilisi’s geographic area code, with mobile prefixes, leading to voice or SMS attempts to landlines that cannot accept text. Up‑to‑date carrier‑lookup or HLR queries are therefore essential. They reveal not only whether a SIM is live but also which operator currently serves it, a detail that dramatically affects routing costs. Domestic termination can be as low as US \$0.015 per SMS on an on‑net bulk contract, whereas international A2P routes may triple that price.
Obtaining Georgian phone‑number data can be broadly divided into three pipelines. The first is purely first‑party: build your own database through website signups, point‑of‑sale registrations, loyalty apps, or QR‑code contests at tourism sites. This path provides iron‑clad GDPR‑style consent, now mandatory for companies with EU clientele or investors, but is slower and requires heavy incentives to persuade users to share personal data in a market that has become wary of spam. The second pipeline is partnership with local enterprises that already hold compliant data—banks, micro‑lenders, insurance brokers, and major retailers such as Carrefour Georgia. These players will not sell raw numbers outright, but they do offer co‑marketing or data‑clean‑room arrangements where anonymised hashes or tokens can be matched against your own audience without directly
Georgia, strategically bridging Europe
Re: Georgia, strategically bridging Europe
Georgia’s unique position as a gateway between Europe and Asia offers incredible opportunities for businesses looking to expand their reach. The country’s strategic location, combined with its growing infrastructure and favorable business environment, makes it an ideal hub for fintech innovation and investment. For those interested in entering this dynamic market, understanding the costs involved is crucial. I found this detailed fintech development app estimate very helpful to get a clear picture of the financial requirements and planning involved. It’s exciting to see how Georgia is evolving as a pivotal bridge in the global economy, attracting tech talent and startups alike.